That program said,
the Republican Party
sent big amount of American citizens
their information which is changed
to suit every citizen's liking
by using his personal data on SNS.
I heard so.
Those actions are often used by spy
who say different information to person by person.
(In Japan, we have a classically famous legend of conquesting such spy, "Yamata-no-Orochi,"
according to my interpretation.)
Politics is our common matter.
So, even if some topics are not near to us,
we have better have our own opinions with big interests.
Because a nation is also a big large meeting
(like meetings of small groups.)
So, there must be no information without any relationship with us.
Politicians must send the same information to every person.
And, Any politicians and any politic associations must open and inform their own true statues, thoughts, political policies to everyone.
At least,
to trust anyone,
we must need a condition that everyone has the same sent information. I can not trust anyone who want to send different information between person by person.
What such people is doing
is only hiding readers eyes by black cloth
not for haveing wishings to read other information by sending big amount of data
which can satisfy readers interests.
It is like saying
"It is OK
for you
to know only this information."
BE NOT CONTROLLED
INFORMATION IN YOUR BRAIN
AS OTHER PEOPLE'S WANTS.
AND
DO NOT DANCE ALONG WITH SUCH INFORMATION
LIKE A PUPPET.
I want to strongly recommend you to study
how to handle correct and precise information.
And
All we can do for doubt information is
to TRASH ALL.
(And more...
1. My recommendation of a body position when we hear someone's telling is written in "201. Do not hear straight."
2. I told my opinion about one of rumor characters in "153. I want to say "Rumors."
3. My reason for my recommend policy to every doubtful information, that is, TRASH, is written in "125. qualities of information.")
I saw many people are flamed or winded by rumors.
In a case of hearing frightening news,
we must not get shaken by other people.
We must be heavier persons. Such light people will be flowed away
to anywhere you do not wish.
Please be careful.
(My site never flame other people.
I wish everyone to select anything along with his heart
and with a cool brain.)
Oh!
I want to say more. They may have only political policies
which will not be selected by other people
when they follow reasonable ways
to inform themselves and their information.
So they must need to use cheat methods,
don't they?
I think that we do not need to trust such cheating people
as correct or good.
This article mainly says
"Problems of education
of correct information treating."
Before we say Democratic Party or the Republican Party,
we must think that we can trust a person or a group like a information spy or not.
(Our lives are affected big by this selection.)
Before we are in quarrels,
before we make disputes,
I think that it is good for you to know first how to treat information
that you hear and tell.
I think deeply that it is dangerous for us
election campaign conditions without information literacy abilities.
<Additional Writings> 2018.11.05
In Japan, we have doubtful persons who did not follow reasonable selecting ways.
As I wrote in "545. Oh, so you said. Please edit that and show us,"
Liberal Democratic Party (of Japan) is OK?
Do they give us a chance to select members of Congress in a fair condition?
(Really?)
<Additional Writings 2> 2018.11.05
I want to compare what articles are sent to all of you.
I think that we have better hold a meeting to compare articles with other people.
(We must check and know crossingly what articles are sent.)
<Additional Writings 3> 2018.11.06
Differences from recommendations by merchants
Merchants, for example Amazon, often show you their "Recommendations for you."
These recommendations and suggestions are made
from our buying history or our answers for questionnaires.
If these suggestions for me differ from those for other people,
it will be no problem,
because we never want to buy all line-ups of suggestion giving merchant,
that is, all products they have.
We always buy some of their dealing products which we like, one by one.
But, politicians are not merchants.
So when we vote to someone or some political group,
it means that
we select a whole of him or a whole of that group.
So "we want you to know and see a few topics of us, not a whole of us"
is not a good attitude of politicians.
So I wrote in the main part of this article, Any politicians and any politic associations must open and inform
their own true statues, thoughts, political policies to everyone.
Anyway,
they selected persons and made a group for article by article,
and sent them their articles.
But there is no cautions for noticing that we are in such situation.
For example,
"This article is selected by your uploaded articles and other input data,
and we send you."
or,
"This article is selected by your uploaded articles and other input date,
and we selected you as suiting person to this article,
so we send you," and so on.
I want to say more.
What did Facebook?
(They were stolen their customers personal data. Boo.
I think those data are used.)
And in a case of recommendations by merchants,
we always check
whether those recommendations truly suit us or not
or whether they are cheap or not.
After we know facts of the best product or services for us,
we will buy that.
If we find better similar selections for us than merchant's recommendations,
we will buy our own findings.
I think that
it is not good for us
not to get facts for believing information which is sent by other people.
